--Differences in languages coming from both light and heavy radius analysis, and also from nuclear and atomic physicists
--Non trivial comparison between muonic atoms and electron scattering
--The RMS charge radius is the first term of the FF expansion
--the SOG or FB doesn't really work with low Q2, Randolf says it's all bullshit, extremely difficult to get reliable charge radii from electron scattering---> this is why we need muonic atom spectroscopy
-muonic atoms measure something like the Barrett radius, transition dependent
-angeli paper has no uncertainties
-Ben has been recalculating the radii with v-factor analysis combining muonic and electron scattering with bootstrapped uncertainties
-Who has access to Ingo Sick's data ?
--Paul has a good recipe where he tested the effect of the nuclear charge distribution for 12C, should be published and redone for other elements
--Randolf used a gaussian charge distribution, but it didn't really matter because the TPE limited everything, the different coefficients don't have a big effect on the RMS charge radius.
--measure the slope of the FF at q2=0, we call it radius.
--Convince Paul to publish his analysis of 12C and extend the methodology to other nuclei