Login

Analysis discussion meeting

→ Europe/Zurich
https://psich.zoom.us/j/67898862738?pwd=YzhWSC90Wm1BRTEyYm1OUmhFQjUwdz09

https://psich.zoom.us/j/67898862738?pwd=YzhWSC90Wm1BRTEyYm1OUmhFQjUwdz09
Hide
Andreas:
What to do next year?
No muX proposal
RefRadii: La? Th?
If La, we need to show we can do the implanted target
 
6129 keV origin
0.5 keV shift in values in literature
new values are wrong: Recoil versus transition
 
 
Narongrit:
Updated geometry for scintillators
Coating grid with PE does not help
Absolute best --> Entrance detector into the gas cell --> Andreas: not really reasonable for highly radioactive targets.
 

G4beamline simulations for the muX set-up in which he investigated a new (though non-realistic) scintillator design.

Looked at veto cutted spectra for Old scintillator - Carbon grid, Old scintillator - Ti grid, New scintillator - Carbon grid.

Investigated events responsible for high energy gammas.

General conclusions: Entrance detector in the gas cell would be better and Area between entrance and going into the gas cell should be made out of active material --> Make more of the area active, but we should be careful where, so that these pieces do not get contaminated if we run with radio-active

 
 
Marie:
Load in geometry via json
Simulation of the array from last year: in progress
Compatibility with new cluster
Scintillator design --> Some basic updates
 
Timing optimized Ge detectors for Si data
Anticoincidence window + gain drift
There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
Powered by Indico v3.3.5-pre